RSS

After vs. before

21 Aug

Reblogged from The Observer:

Click to visit the original post

Finland, as I've written previously, completely revamped its education system. It did so for both obvious and more subtle reasons. First, its international test scores sucked. Second, Finnish leaders were anxious to create a more vibrant, competitive private sector, one it hoped would be spurred by increased educational performance. They succeeded, spectacularly so (source: Wikipedia).

But you won't hear much about the Finnish reform movement.

Read more… 1,011 more words

Yes, Finland is a great example of how to educate children and there is a wide gap between Finland and America's cultures. However, in the US, every public school teacher should walk out and demand respect and the truth about the achievements in Education in this country before returning to the classroom. Joseph Goebbels, one of Hitler's inner circle in the Nazi Party, once said, "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will come to believe it." You see, it all depends on how the facts are presented. The critics of public education have a loud voice and use language that shows the glass half empty instead of about 90% full, which is more accurate. Once all the facts about high-school graduation rates, the perception changes dramatically. To achieve this, one must start more than a century back and chart the progress . I'll start with 1900 when the total number of high school graduates in the US numbered 16,000 of 815,000 seventeen-year olds. In 1920, 311,000 graduated from high school or 16.8% of the total which was 1,855,000 In 1940, 1,221,000 or 50,8% of 2,403,000 graduated. In 1960, 1,858,000 or 69.5% of 2,672,00 graduated. In 1980, 3,043,000 or 71.4% of 4,262,00 graduated. Source: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93442.pdf After 1970, high school graduation rates level off and fluctuated but stayed pretty close. in 2009, 75.5% of high school students that started as freshman graduated. In addition, In 2009, some 89.8 percent of 18- through 24-year-olds not enrolled in high school had received a high school diploma or alternative credential. How does this compare with other countries? In 2008, the U.S. high school graduation rate was lower than the rates of ten countries: The United Kingdom, Switzerland, Norway, South Korea, Japan, Italy, Ireland, Germany, Finland and Denmark. Source: http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11/03/how-u-s-graduation-rates-compare-with-the-rest-of-the-world/ However, there are 193 countries represented in the UN, putting the United States High School graduation rate in the top 5.69% of all the nations that are members of the UN. That means 94.31% of the Earth's countries have lower high school graduation rates. When do we see these types of comparison from the American media or critics of public education in the US? Never The next question is, "What is the political and economic agenda of these critics and a media that seems controlled by the critics?"
 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

One Response to After vs. before

  1. Luisa

    August 24, 2012 at 10:50

    Yesterday, while I was at work, my sister stole my apple ipad
    and tested to see if it can survive a 25 foot drop, just so she can be a youtube
    sensation. My iPad is now destroyed and she has 83 views.
    I know this is entirely off topic but I had to share it with someone!

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 40 other followers

%d bloggers like this: